Home News & Views
News & Views

Extracts from the News and Views section of the magazine.

To read the complete article buy the latest edition, or even better take out a subscription and save more money. To subscribe to Labour Briefing just email office@labourbriefing.org.uk



Another train crash expected? PDF Print E-mail
Magazine - News & Views
Monday, 27 February 2012 21:31

The forthcoming White Paper is expected to propose more fragmentation and privatisation on the railways. A train driver reports.

The Government is preparing a White Paper on the future of the rail industry. Rail unions are preparing to oppose this if it includes the recommendations of a major report on the rail industry, the McNulty report, published last May. They held a big lobby of Parliament against the report last October, and have been leafleting passengers at stations over the winter. The McNulty review was set up by the last Labour Government to find ways of cutting public subsidy to rail.

McNulty’s recommendations would lead to a more fragmented and less safe rail industry, with worse services, more overcrowding, and attacks on the pay, jobs, and conditions of rail workers. McNulty proposed closing ticket offices at 675 smaller stations and reducing opening times at 302 more, thus affecting about 40% of rail stations. To give just one example of the effect of this: one branch line in Surrey with three trains an hour each way off peak would have the ticket offices closed at six of its seven stations.

McNulty also recommended that the requirement for Train Operating Companies (TOCs) to consult the public and secure ministerial approval before cutting ticket offices should end. He said off-peak fares should go up to hit passengers travelling either side of the rush hour, on top of the fares rises (3% over the RPI) until 2014 already scheduled. He wants to downgrade rural rail services, including replacing trains with trams or light rail.

McNulty proposed removing guards from the many trains they presently work on – making Driver Only Operation the norm – and cutting  maintenance staffing, leading to a lower standard of maintenance of track and signals. He said pay rises for rail staff should not be above inflation and TOCs should “review” paying staff for meal and other breaks.

McNulty wants to break up Network Rail. This goes against lessons learned from recent experiences. Network Rail’s predecessor Railtrack contracted maintenance work out to many different companies, but it went bust after the fatal accidents at Hatfield, Potters Bar and Ladbroke Grove. Network Rail, which replaced it, brought maintenance work back in-house resulting in improved efficiency and standards.

The ideological bias of the McNulty report in favour of privatisation is shown by the way its recommendations contradict its analysis of the rail industry. He found that Britain’s privatised rail industry is at least three times more expensive to run than British Rail was, after allowing for inflation, and it is less efficient than the largely nationalised and integrated railways in other European countries. He admits that the large number of different companies involved is the reason for this. Yet McNulty ignored the best way to improve the rail network, which is to bring it back into public ownership and put the bits back together. This would end the costs produced by the many interfaces between different companies (including paying for the hundreds of lawyers in TOCs and Network Rail who deal with each other) and the billions taken out of the rail industry in profits and in greater private sector borrowing costs since privatisation.

Most of the rail industry could be brought back into public ownership at no cost. Network Rail is a non-profit making company halfway between the public and private sectors and could easily be nationalised. Rail lines could be brought back into the public sector as the franchises end or their owners run into difficulty – for example the East Coast Main Line is now in the public sector after its owners gave up the franchise.

The Government is already going ahead with some of McNulty’s recommendations before putting a White Paper to Parliament. The Department for Transport has told bidders for the Great Western franchise – due to be re-let from April 2013 –  that they must close ticket offices at 29 stations and cut opening hours at 17 more.

Maria Eagle, Shadow Transport Secretary, criticised the report in a recent RMT News and admits that the Labour Government should have been less timid in dealing with the fragmented structure of the rail industry. In answer to her own question, “What is Labour’s alternative?” she proposes another review. In fact, the Labour Party does have an alternative. Conference policy is for renationalisation of rail (after a motion from TSSA was successful in 2004).

RMT and TSSA are now in merger talks, after working closely in campaigns and disputes in many companies in recent years. A merger would make industrial sense, as most of the divisions in working conditions ended since rail privatisation in the 1990s. A united union would be stronger in the transport companies and also in influence within the TUC.
The main obstacle is over the Labour Party. The TSSA is affiliated, and it has insisted that a merged Union should affiliate to the Labour Party. The RMT was disaffiliated for supporting the Scottish Socialist Party. It would be a wasted opportunity if the RMT was to turn down a potential merger over this question.

 
What future for Wales? PDF Print E-mail
Magazine - News & Views
Monday, 27 February 2012 21:28

A contribution to dialogue on the left from Leanne Wood AM, a candidate in the Paid Cymru leadership election.

The British state is going through fundamental political changes. Alex Salmond MSP is developing his case for Scottish independence – or, at the very least, full autonomy – on a left-leaning ticket. Martin McGuinness contested the Irish Republic’s presidential elections as a republican from the north.

In England, the political choice appears to be welfare reform under David Cameron or welfare reform under Liam Byrne. Ed Miliband is predictably shifting to the right. A paradox that makes Welsh politics more interesting is that although the Labour party here in Wales is positioned to the left of New Labour, we also have a genuinely Welsh alternative in Plaid Cymru. Comrades in England will no doubt be interested in the Plaid Cymru leadership contest.

Plaid Cymru is currently the third party in Welsh politics after disappointing election results last May. The potential for a revival in our fortunes is considerable, however. In a four party system that involves an element of proportional representation, enabling what Raymond Williams called “the left speaking in its own voice,” Plaid Cymru simply can’t be written off.

Our leadership campaign has shown that the grassroots of the party remains vibrant, solid and ready to engage in serious community activism.  Last March we saw the attainment of full legislative powers for Wales in the devolved fields, which preceded our disappointing election. However, even now our arguments are still being heard, and further change for Wales is likely as the serious concerns about control of our natural resources, energy policy and the ability to raise money are now issues that are all on the mainstream political agenda.

It’s easy to write off constitutional change as not being relevant to working people.  Elements of Labour in all parts of the UK have traditionally been guilty of this. The reality in Wales is that constitutional change is the key to delivering an alternative form of politics that can appeal to working people and other sections of society. Without constitutional changes, we would be unable to develop distinctive policies to meet Welsh needs. It is an uphill struggle, especially when the Treasury still controls the purse strings and all of the major economic policy functions. However, with limited devolution in Wales we have seen glimpses of a different course to the neoliberal agenda to which New Labour and the Tory-Lib Dem coalition are wedded.

In Scotland Labour has recently elected Johann Lamont as leader. There is a huge contrast in the way that our contest in Plaid Cymru is relatively open to the public to examine. In the Scottish election there seemed to be an absence of debate on ideas about society, the economy or communities. Was Scottish Labour choosing a leader purely to react to the SNP’s success and not to chart its own unique course?  Johann Lamont is already on the back foot and effectively siding with Cameron against Salmond rather than drawing up her own alternative to Scottish independence.

Plaid Cymru’s leadership campaign contrasts starkly with this.  The left in Plaid Cymru, a tendency which has generally been rich in intellectualism, direct action and policy development, is working hard to stake out alternative ideas that would enhance Plaid’s role as a left-nationalist party demanding sovereignty for the Welsh people.  New members have been recruited to the party since the start of our campaign.  New members are a vital source of income for Plaid – we do not receive any funding from big business or the Labour-affiliated trade unions.  The increase in membership is a significant boost and gives us a platform to build on, whoever eventually wins.

It is not enough simply to manage the devolved functions in Wales. Welsh Labour is currently governing alone and, despite sharing some of our values, has to be careful not to tread on the feet of its generally right wing group of MPs. As former Plaid MP Adam Price has said, the primary difference between Plaid Cymru and Welsh Labour isn’t one of values, it’s one of ambition. Put simply: if there is no ambition for Wales eventually to become an independent state, then what is the incentive to develop the country and its communities?

 
Out of the shadows and fighting for justice PDF Print E-mail
Magazine - News & Views
Monday, 27 February 2012 21:15

David Landau and Doug Holton, Travellers Solidarity Network (TSN), look at the plight of Roma and Travellers after Dale Farm.

The brutal Dale Farm eviction thrust Travellers onto newspaper front pages and television screens – but it was not an exceptional event. Such evictions happen continually. What was unusual was the degree of resistance and solidarity and the scale of forces that the state mobilised to meet this.

The usual scenario is that a gang of thuggish bailiffs come on to a site – often without proper legal authorisation – and smash stuff up and physically throw the Travellers out. The police, supposedly there to keep the peace, do nothing about the assaults and criminal damage visited on the Travellers and even lend a hand to the bailiffs if things get out of hand. At Dale Farm, 300 riot police in riot gear burst in, using tazers, to make way for the bailiffs.

Basildon Council spent £8 million and police costs for the eviction were a further £10 million – at a time of austerity. Their excuse was that they were upholding the law: the Travellers did not have planning permission and were on Green Belt land. However, it used to be a scrapyard before the Travellers bought it and applied for planning permission – and now it is like a bomb site.

As Dale Farm resident Mary Flynn said, “Basildon Council spent nearly £8 million on making 83 families homeless. We’ve only moved 50 metres down the road – we’ve nowhere else to go. Basildon Council should spend that money on providing alternative sites and a solution for our community.”

Travellers and Roma have suffered persecution for centuries. They face racist harassment, name-calling and bullying at school and discrimination at work. They are barred from many pubs and restaurants. You still get signs appearing saying “Travellers strictly by appointment only”, despite the fact that these have been outlawed as a result of cases brought by the old Commission for Racial Equality. East European Roma children will tend to say that they are Polish, Romanian, Hungarian or Czech, rather than let it be known that they are Gypsies. Roma adults will say the same to employers. Gypsies and Travellers have the lowest life expectancy of any ethnic group in Britain – around 54 years for men.
This persecution is international and persistent. The Nazis targeted Roma for extermination in the Holocaust. Over half a million perished in the camps. Today fascist parties like Jobbik in Hungary campaign against the Roma. Their settlements have been set alight and the residents shot at as they have fled. When Roma have fled eastern Europe to France and Italy, they have faced a state crackdown. The French government has deported Roma back to eastern Europe, which is illegal given that they are EU citizens.

Here in Britain, east European Roma get vilified. There have been campaigns against them involving councillors from a variety of parties, including Labour. The police and media have encouraged the perception that they are heavily involved in child trafficking and using children to beg and commit crime.

In 1994 the Tory Government took away the obligation for local authorities to provide sites for Travellers. They encouraged people to buy their own land. Gypsies and Travellers struggled to raise the money to do so, only to find that they frequently could not get planning permission to live on their land. This is why people at Dale Farm found themselves evicted.

The battle of Dale Farm is not yet over. As they always said, the evicted Travellers had nowhere to go. Tony Ball, Leader of Basildon Council, told the press he did not know what the fuss was about because they could go to the authorised site next door. Some Travellers did just that. Now Basildon Council is seeking eviction proceedings against the authorised site for overcrowding! Other people have returned and parked up on the road approaching the waste land that was their home. They too have been served with eviction notices and action against them might take place very soon.

To add insult to injury, Tony Ball has been short listed for the Leader of the Year category in the 2012 Local Government Information Unit (LGiU) Achievement Awards in recognition of his role at Dale Farm. Dale Farm Travellers have reacted with shock and anger at the nomination and are calling on LGiU to drop Tony Ball from their list of nominees.
Eva Potts, a member of the TSN, said, “Tony Ball has torn apart a community, leaving them in desperate circumstances, while wasting public money that could have been spent constructively on public services in Basildon. To say he deserves an award is absurd and disgusting; Tony Ball does not serve communities – he wrecks them.”

Dale Farm Solidarity and the TSN have organised a protest outside the LGiU’s award ceremony at Westminster City Hall on 27th February, where they plan to present Tony Ball with an alternative award for Community Wrecker of the Year.

Across Europe Gypsies and Travellers are organising and fighting for their rights and people are organising in solidarity. In the wake of the Dale Farm eviction, the TSN was set up to fight evictions and other attacks on Travellers and Gypsies. Our principles are set out below.

The labour and trades union movement has no great history of support for Gypsies and Travellers and the prejudices current in society infect many members. However, when people start to organise for themselves, trade unions take issues on board, as has been seen with the women’s movement, the anti-racist movement, the migrant movement and the LGBT movement. This needs to happen with Gypsies and Travellers. It has already begun: a number of trades councils gave support to Dale Farm. Megan Dobney from SERTUC spoke at a rally at Dale Farm a couple of weeks before the eviction.

We need to build on this. There needs to be a campaign for support and affiliation in the trade union and labour movement, promoting awareness about the real issues. The TSN is organising a speaking tour. Union and Labour Party branches can invite us to speak or, better still, organise a public meeting. Trade unions, especially those active in local authorities, can encourage a policy of non-co-operation with evictions. Teachers unions can fight against cuts to resources for Gypsy and Traveller children. There is much that the movement can do and the time is now.

Smithy Fen reprieve

South Cambridgeshire Council has delayed moves to place injunctions on Traveller families at Smithy Fen forcing them to leave the land that they own. The Travellers are now applying for planning permission to make green improvements for the site.

Travellers from Smithy Fen and their supporters welcome the move. They say that pursuing injunctions would leave families destitute on the roadside, removing children from their education and increasing the vulnerability of residents who are in critical need of support from specialist local health care services.

The Travellers’ new development plans represent an opportunity to make radical transformations to part of the site, improving environmental

Model Resolution

This branch deplores the continuing racism and disadvantage experienced by Roma and Traveller communities in the UK. Roma and Travellers comprise one of the most marginalised minorities in the UK, facing both direct racism and institutional racism in access to education, healthcare and other services. It is shocking that racism against Roma and Travellers remains largely mainstream and respectable, with routine campaigns against Roma or Traveller sites and the families who live in them.

This bigotry has been most sharply brought into focus at Dale Farm, with Basildon Council displaying an irrational hatred of Traveller residents, and the police using wholly unacceptable levels of violence – including the use of tasers – in clearing the site. We also note that Con-Dem cuts fall unequally, and it is the most disadvantaged groups – including Roma and Traveller communities – that are now paying a high price for an economic crisis they have not caused. We welcome the rise of self-organised campaigning and resistance by these communities, and the development of broader support organisations such as the Traveller Solidarity Network. We believe that support for these organisations is wholly in line with our union’s vision of a society based on justice and equality.

We therefore resolve to:

  1. affiliate to the Traveller Solidarity Network;
  2. pay TSN’s annual union branch affiliation fee of £50 and donate a further £xx towards campaign expenses;
  3. actively support Roma and Traveller rights, including publicising events organised by the TSN to our members and urging their support, including taking part in the international Roma Nation Day Event on 8th April;
  4. support members who refuse to co-operate with evictions against Traveller Sites.
  • For more information, contact This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

 

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 10 of 10